Cramer Remix: Is the Biotech Bear Market Over?

Provided by CNBC

Amid news of explosions in Belgium’s capital on Tuesday, stocks were justifiably down at the open, but then rallied for most of the afternoon and pulled back shortly before the close.

Jim Cramer explained the action on the market, stating “We call it the underlying bid. That is a term that means buyers are lurking underneath current prices and when those prices drop, people start buying.”

By the end of the day, the stocks affected were those directly related to travel and leisure as they will have the most have a loss of business. Cramer added that the rest of the market was able to mount a comeback because there has been an underlying bid since stocks bottomed in mid-February.

Beyond that, Cramer noted that another event occurred to suggest stocks are undervalued currently. Tremendously negative commentary emerged from both Transocean (RIG) and Schlumberger (SLB), with the companies stating that it could take years before things get better.

But these stocks barely budged; Cramer interpreted this as resilience.

The technology sector also displayed resilience; the group continued to climb though there hasn’t been any big news lately.

Even the health care bear market seemed to be coming to an end, or at least show promise. Pharmaceuticals were once even more loathed than the banks after political attention turned their attention to the issue of price gouging.

“I don’t want to pronounce the big bear market over in all of health care. However, it does seem to be the case that the pressure is off for now, with both big pharma and fast growing biotech stocks having reached levels where the sellers seem to have gone away,” Cramer said.

In the wake of Tuesday’s terrorist attacks in Brussels, Cramer did some serious thinking. He noticed a pattern that every time a terrible attack occurs, every stock in the travel and leisure space goes lower.

“That is just a fact, and an understandable one at that,” the “Mad Money” host said.

However, Cramer also noticed the pattern that eventually investors stop being scared, and the travel stocks rebound.

“On a day when this whole group went down, let me tell you why it could be smart to own an airline stock or a company like Priceline, but it could be foolish to bet on a cruise company like Carnival (CCL) or Royal Caribbean(RCL),” Cramer said.

The difference for Cramer was related to another story in the headlines recently — Zika virus. The stocks Cramer found were most immune to Zika were airlines and online travel agents, with Delta, United, American and Southwest (LUV) all trading at cheap levels.

Cramer also noted that Yum Brands, the parent of KFC, Taco Bell and Pizza had has roared 20 percent in the past six weeks.

He attributed the success to Yum reporting a strong quarter in February, and because Yum broke itself up in a move that Cramer thinks could unlock immense value.

“So if you have been sitting on the sidelines watching this stock rally, I’ve got news for you: it is not too late to buy Yum,” Cramer said.

Provided by CNBC


Provided by CNBC

Since the market bottomed in mid-February, commodities have dramatically rebounded from their lows. Cramer has watched as everything from copper, iron ore, aluminum to oil have worked their way higher.

While the rally took a break on Tuesday, commodities have been on the decline for years, leading Cramer to ask if this is a genuine rally or simply a long overdue, oversold bounce.

Cramer turned to the help of Carley Garner to look at the charts and assess what the future of the commodity complex could look like. Garner is a technician and commodities expert who is the co-founder of DeCarley Tradingand a colleague of Cramer’s at

Garner found that while it has been tough to be bullish on commodities in the past, the group could finally be showing promise. This is significant to Cramer, as the strength in commodities is a huge reason why the stock market has been able to roar higher since February.

Cramer was also saddened by the news of the passing of Andy Grove, one of the founders of Intel, who understood the business better than anyone he had ever met.

“Thank you, Andy Grove, for all you did to make it so everyone could afford computing. Thank you for all you did to create so much wealth for so many. Thank you for showing that raw intelligence, hard work and honesty can indeed pay off in this great country,” Cramer said.

In the Lightning Round, Cramer gave his take on a few caller-favorite stocks:

Michael Kors: “The accessory stocks are doing better, and I like Kors, but I think Coach is in better shape. I would pick up some Coach right here.”

Advanced Micro Devices: “The personal computer space is hurting. It’s even hurting for Intel, so that’s certainly bad news for AMD. I would not take advantage of this recent rally other than to sell the stock.”

Written by Abigail Stevenson of CNBC

(Source: CNBC)

What a Non-Recessionary Bear Might Look Like

Bear markets can occur without recessions. There have been ten bear markets in the S&P 500 since 1968, and four of them occurred without an accompanying recession. Bear markets are commonly defined as 20% peak-totrough declines based on closing prices, though we include two 19% drawdowns in this analysis, with one of them (1998) getting well past the 20% mark on an intra-day price basis (1976 is the other). Here we look at the characteristics of these non-recessionary bear markets to assess the probability that stocks enter a bear market even if the U.S. avoids recession in 2016.


Bear markets can occur without recessions. Going back to 1968, ten bear markets have occurred with six accompanied by recessions [Figure 1]. The accompanying figure shows just how much more painful bear markets are when they are tied to recessions. In the six recessionary bear markets since 1968, the average peak-to-trough S&P 500 decline was a whopping 39%. The thought of such a decline when compared to where we are now, 11.6% below the May 21, 2015 record high, could make your stomach churn. (In the February 1, 2016, Weekly Economic Commentary, John Canally spelled out reasons why we do not expect a repeat of 2008, which would remove one big negative possibility from the equation).

Based on our assessment of the economic data, we see the odds of a recession in the next year as still low (perhaps as high now as 30%), although certainly some indicators suggest an even higher probability. The risk remains that a policy mistake, such as an overly aggressive Federal Reserve (Fed), as in the mid-1970s, financial crisis (such as 1998 or 2011), or excessive speculation (a la 1987) drives the S&P 500 down another 8-9% to the 20% threshold. That is not our base case at this point but we do suggest a slightly more cautious approach toward equity markets as these odds have increased. The average S&P 500 loss in a non-recessionary bear market has been 23%; still more than 10% below Friday’s closing level.

Screen Shot 2016-02-09 at 3.17.34 PM


Taking a closer look at the non-recessionary bear markets of 1976, 1987, 1998, and 2011, we place the market declines into three categories: ƒ

  • Policy mistake. Fed tightening played a role in the 1976 bear market, which was accompanied by rising oil prices. The Fed raised the federal funds rate by 2 percent in 1977, the 10-year yield jumped 100 basis points, and oil prices started on a path to doubling in just two years. The 1998 bear market was partly brought on by policy mistakes in Asia regarding managing their currencies, and was exacerbated by a lack of regulatory oversight into Long Term Capital Management (LTCM) that led to its becoming a systemic risk and eventual failure. (LTCM was a very large unregulated investment management firm with significant leverage that led to a multibillion dollar bailout after more than $4 billion in losses.) The Fed’s 25 basis point (0.25%) hike in the federal funds rate in March of 1997 did not help, but the selloff didn’t start until July of 1998 and the Fed’s three rate cuts in late 1998 helped end the crisis. ƒ
  • Financial crisis. In 1998, a Russian default and collapse of LTCM got most of the headlines, but the Asian currency crisis that started in Thailand spread to other Southeast Asian countries (Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Philippines) and eventually into South America. In 2011, stocks struggled with two crises: the European debt crisis and the U.S. debt ceiling fight and related downgrade of the U.S. credit rating by Standard & Poor’s. The solvency of the European banking system was in question due to heavy exposure to bad debts from heavily indebted European sovereigns, e.g., Greece, Spain, Portugal, and Italy. At the same time, some were questioning the credibility of the U.S. as a borrower.
  • ƒ Excessive speculation. The crash of 1987 involved excessive speculation. Stocks were up 33% year to date as of September 30, 1987, one of the strongest starts for the S&P 500 in any year in history (second only to 43% in 1933). Stock valuations were very high relative to bonds, with the S&P 500 earnings yield (inverse of the price-to-earnings ratio) of 5.7% well below the 10-year Treasury yield at 9.6% as of September 30, 1987. Only 2000 saw a bigger spread over the past 40 years. Too many big players in the market tried to hedge portfolios at the same time, exaggerating the slide. The situation was exacerbated when institutions that sold portfolio insurance propelled another wave of selling when those “insurance claims” were cashed in.


The most important question for investors today is could we be entering a bear market and, if so, would one of these three potential catalysts cause it?

Policy mistake. The Fed is the most obvious potential policy mistake looming, although we do expect the central bank to pull back from its stated timetable of four rate hikes in 2016. It is tough to characterize a single quarter-point hike as a mistake no matter what the eventual outcome. But a series of hikes could end up as a policy mistake leading to a bear market if it precedes dislocations in global financial markets, tightening credit conditions, and another potential leg down in global growth and earnings.

Besides the Fed, a policy mistake out of Washington is possible, though unlikely, depending on how the presidential election in November plays out. Looking to overseas markets, though not our expectation, China could mismanage its economy and suffer a hard landing.

Odds: About 30%.

Financial crisis. China is a primary concern among those calling for a bear market or recession. A significant currency devaluation could potentially drive a financial crisis similar to the Asian currency crisis that preceded the 1998 bear market. We would place the odds of a China-driven currency crisis at well below 50% given: 1) most Asian currencies are no longer pegged to the U.S. dollar, as they were in the late 1990s, 2) Asian economies’ finances and trade flows are in much better shape today, and 3) China has the ability and willingness to prevent it.

Another possible scenario is a repeat of the European debt crisis of 2011-2012. European banks generally have less capital than U.S. banks and may be more vulnerable; although actions taken by the European Central Bank (ECB) and the weaker European countries since 2011 mitigate this risk. Balance sheets are in better shape today and sovereign risk is low. Another debt ceiling fight, which also contributed to the 2011 bear market, is simply not in the cards.

Also unlikely in our view is an oil-driven financial crisis. Energy company defaults could increase due to low oil prices, but we believe the markets are pricing in more defaults than will actually be realized. Also consider those defaults would put downward pressure on oil supplies and support prices. Finally, while credit spreads have widened even for non-energy companies, we have not seen credit availability restricted nearly enough to signal a financial crisis, as evidenced by the most recent Fed Senior Loan Officers Survey showing a still small, though gradually rising, number of banks tightening credit standards for business loans [Figure 2].

Odds: About 20%.

Screen Shot 2016-02-09 at 3.20.21 PM

Excessive speculation. This potential bear market driver may be the easiest one to dismiss. Stock market valuations are reasonable at roughly 16 times trailing earnings. Factoring in interest rates, the S&P 500 is significantly cheaper than it was in 1987. The S&P 500 earnings yield stood 4% above the 10-year Treasury yield as of January 31, 2016, compared to September 30, 1987, just ahead of the October 1987 crash, when the earnings yield was about 4% below Treasury yields.

We do not see signs of excessive risk taking in the options markets and investor surveys such as that from the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) indicate widespread pessimism see January 19, 2016, Weekly Market Commentary, “Any Bulls Left”. Strategies to hedge against stock declines have become increasingly popular as a result of that pessimism and market participants waiting for the next shoe to drop.

Finally, while the S&P 500 had risen more than 30% in nine months in September of 1987, the index has been virtually flat since May of 2014 and traded in one of its tightest ranges ever over a 21 month period, hardly indicative of any excesses.

Odds: Less than 10%.


Our forecast remains no recession in 2016 and an S&P 500 correction that stops short of a 20% bear market decline. But even in the absence of recession, history suggests that a bear market remains possible. Given the possibility that a policy mistake or financial crisis sends U.S. stocks into a bear market, perhaps with odds as high as 30%, we would encourage investors, where appropriate, to consider maintaining slightly above average cash levels for dry powder should the recent selloff worsen.

Weekly Market Commentary: January 20, 2016

Provided by geralt/Pixabay
Provided by geralt/Pixabay

We all have our pet peeves, and if there is one thing markets do NOT like, it is uncertainty. Unfortunately, we entered 2016 with a lot of unanswered questions:

  • How much has China’s growth slowed? How will the country’s slower growth affect companies and investments around the globe?
  • How will the Federal Reserve’s changing monetary policy affect the U.S. economy? How many times will it raise rates during 2016? Will the Fed change course?
  • Will oil prices continue to move lower? Will they move higher? How could changing oil prices affect economic growth?
  • How is the sharing economy (renting rooms in a home, offering rides for a price, sharing goods like automobiles and bikes) affecting economic growth in the United States?
  • How will demographics – particularly the changing ratio of working people to retired people – affect economic growth?
  • How will geopolitical risks affect markets during 2016?

Amidst all of this uncertainty, the words ‘market correction’ (a drop of at least 10 percent in the value of the market) and ‘bear market’ (a drop of 20 percent or more in the value of the market) are being bandied about frequently. According to Barron’s, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index finished last week in correction territory. So, are we headed for a bear market? That remains to be seen.

Bear markets often are accompanied by recessions, and few experts believe a recession is likely in the United States during 2016. Historically, there have been bear markets which have occurred without a recession. These have lasted, on average, for about five months. That’s far shorter than the 20-month average length of bear markets that come in tandem with recessions.

One expert cited by Barron’s commented on the market downturn, “If there’s a silver lining, it’s that the market is a lot cheaper than it was a few months ago. The S&P 500 trades at 15.9 times 12-month forward earnings forecasts…back where valuations were at the beginning of 2014. That means there are values to be had.”

Data as of 1/15/16 1-Week Y-T-D 1-Year 3-Year 5-Year 10-Year
Standard & Poor’s 500 (Domestic Stocks) -2.2% -8.0% -5.6% 8.5% 7.7% 3.9%
Dow Jones Global ex-U.S. -3.4 -9.3 -14.1 -4.1 -3.3 -0.7
10-year Treasury Note (Yield Only) 2.0 NA 1.8 1.8 3.4 4.3
Gold (per ounce) -0.7 3.0 -13.1 -13.3 -4.3 7.1
Bloomberg Commodity Index -4.2 -6.5 -27.8 -19.3 -14.6 -8.0
DJ Equity All REIT Total Return Index -2.7 -5.6 -8.5 7.4 10.0 6.3

S&P 500, Dow Jones Global ex-US, Gold, Bloomberg Commodity Index returns exclude reinvested dividends (gold does not pay a dividend) and the three-, five-, and 10-year returns are annualized; the DJ Equity All REIT Total Return Index does include reinvested dividends and the three-, five-, and 10-year returns are annualized; and the 10-year Treasury Note is simply the yield at the close of the day on each of the historical time periods.